 |
|
We have already seen a one dimensional (Logistic map) and a two
dimensional (Henon map) show extremely complicated behavior. As the
name indicates they are systems that are modelled using discrete
time scheme where, in general, the current state of the system
depends upon state of the variables in the previous state. The chaos
generating mechanism was attributed to the stretch-fold mechanism
of the equations.
In this section, we will take examples from a modeling technique
which treats time as continuous independent variable and the
time variation of the state space variables depend upon the
current value of the state space variables. In this section, we
will restrict to the class of problems that are modelled using
ordinary differential equations (ODEs) where time is the independent
variable and all state variables change with time. A numerical
method of solving delay time differential equation (Mackey-Glass
equation) can be found here. A numerical
method for partial differential equations - independent time and space -
(PDEs) is given here. A related simplified
method - via coupled map lattice (CML) or
coupled ODEs are also provided.
An example of a dynamical system in which time is a continuous variable
is a system of N first-order,ordinary differential equations, expressed as,
which in vector form is expressed as
This is a dynamical system because, given the initial state of the
system x(t0) at t = t0, we can, in principle, determine the
future state of the system x(t) at any
time t > t0.
The space (x(1),x(2), ¼, x(N)) is referred to as the
phase space and N determines the dimension of the phase space.
The path in phase space followed by the system as it evolves with time
is called the orbit or trajectory. It is common to refer
to a continuous time dynamical system as a flow.
It should be noted that the functions (F1, F2, ¼, FN) depend
on the state variables (x(1),x(2), ¼, x(N)) and
also on one or more parameters, not denoted explicitly. Also, time
itself does not appear in these functions explicitly. In such a case
the system is said to be autonomous. Systems with functions
(F1, F2, ¼, FN) that depend explicitly on time are called
nonautonomous and can be reduced to autonomous form by introducing
a new variable xN+1 with its time evolution defined as
[dx/dt](N+1) = 1 º FN+1. By doing this we have essentially
enlarged the number of dimensions of the phase space by 1 to include
time as one of the phase space variables.
Rossler's system is probably the simplest 3-D ODEs that have quadratic
nonlinearity and exhibits chaotic behavior. Formally they are given by
the following set of three first order coupled nonlinear ordinary
differential equations:
| dx/dt |
= |
-(y + z) |
| dy/dt |
= |
x + ay |
| dz/dt |
= |
b + z(x - c) |
where a, b, and c are system parameters and x, y, z are the state
space variables of the Rossler system. Before these system parameters
are set to some specific values, we try to locate the fixed point of
the system. Note, unlike Lorenz system, (0, 0, 0) is not the
fixed point of the system. However, we can still find the fixed
points as a function of the system parameter and comment on the
existence and the stability of these solutions. From the above set
of equations, it follows that the location of the fixed points are
given by z = -y = x/a and x is determined by solving the quadratic
equation x2 - c*x + a*b = 0. Thus, x = (c + sqrt(c*c - 4*a*b))/2
and x = (c - sqrt(c*c - 4*a*b))/2 and the solution exists if
(c*c - 4*a*b) > 0 and a is not equal to zero.
In what follows, some of the output from the simulation of Rossler
system is provided. Figure below shows the 3-D plot and two projections of the Rossler
chaotic attractor for a = 0.2, b = 0.2, and c = 5.7. Click on the
3-D figure to see the animation of the rotation of the attractor about
the Z-axis.
 |
|
3D Rossler attractor for a=0.2, b=0.2, and c=5.7
|
|
|
Here is the computer code that
generates the attractor. Note, you can simulate any number of models
by changing the function void model() and appropriately setting the
parameter values. If you prefer to run it with X-Window interface to
see real time display of the data, use the X-Window library provided
here, and a simple example code how to use
the library is also provided. There are many other, relatively sophisticated,
examples provided, check the download section. Among other things, like
color display, text display, it allows you to change the parameter values
at run time. The implementation example is for an example of an impact
oscillator system.
The attractor shown above for the parameter settings is a chaotic attractor.
To reveal the connection between the chaos generating mechanism for the
case of Logistic map and that of the
continuous time Rossler system, we use the technique of Poincaré
surface of section (taken when the phase variable x goes through a maxima) and
plot the current maxima against the previous maxima. Such a plot
is called the return map. The result of such a plot is shown in the
figure below.

|
|
Return Map for Rossler attractor shown above, obtained by plotting the value
of x obtained by taking the Poincaré section when x goes through the
maxima value.
|
The surprising result of this procedure is that the
resulting return map is reminiscent of the logistic and other unimodal maps which
may therefore be viewed as models of continuous chaos when the phase space is
strongly contracting. This is further revealed by plotting the bifurcation diagram
at the Poincaré section as a function of c. Note there exists no solution
for the Rossler system for c < 2.0*sqrt(a*b) as discussed above.

|
|
Bifurcation Diagram for Rossler system, obtained by plotting the value
of x obtained by taking the Poincaré section when x goes through the
maxima as a function of c.
|
You can download the computer code written in C that generates the
return map and the
bifurcation diagram obtained above.
Note the program can be easily modified to study any system modelled using ODEs.
CLICK HERE FOR THE ANIMATION.
What is it that we mean when we say there is sensitive dependence on
initial conditions and the related question of unpredictabillity
of chaotic systems. To answer this question, we consider the time
evolution of a large number of nearby initial conditions in the
neighborhood of a chaotic attractor. The animation shown below
illustrates the result for the case of the Rossler attractor At first,
the initial points (there are one hundred thousand initial conditions in the
yellow 'dot') travel together. But with the passage of time, they are
stretched out, split apart and folded back on each other.
After repeated episodes of stretching and folding, the
points are distributed over the entire attractor so that the
most one can say is that there is a probability distribution
which determines the likelihood that a trajectory will be in
a given neighborhood of the attractor at any particular time.
This distribution, or "measure," is invariant in the
sense that it maps to itself under the action of the differential
equations In other words, the long-term state of the system can
be predicted only statistically.
Here is the code, that generates the computer code implementation, in C,
of the code that generates the data file for different frames of the
animation.
The above code can be easily modified, to study mixing in any system
modelled by ODEs. Change the model in the function void model() and
set the parameter values appropriately. The code uses the 4th order
Runge-Kutta integrator.
- [1]
-
J. M. T. Thompson and H. B Stewart,
Nonlinear dynamics and chaos : geometrical methods for engineers and
scientists, Chichester [West Sussex] ; New York : Wiley, c1986.
- [2]
-
Heinz-Otto Peitgen, Hartmut J|rgens, Dietmar Saupe,
Chaos and fractals : new frontiers of science,
New York : Springer-Verlag, c1992.
|